Performance Evaluation of an Air–Oil Brake System in Straw-Thresher Combines Compared to Hydraulic Systems

Document Type : Original Research

Authors

Department of Biosystem, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Bu-Ali Sina, Hamedan, Iran

10.22103/bbr.2026.27075.1149

Abstract

The brake system in straw-thresher combines plays a crucial role in operational safety and machine control under field working conditions. The objective of this study was to design, construct, and evaluate the performance of a simultaneous air–oil brake system for a straw-thresher combine and to compare it with the conventional fully hydraulic brake system. In this study, a simultaneous air–oil brake system was designed and fabricated for a straw-thresher combine. In the proposed system, air pressure is first applied to the brake shoes and pads, followed by hydraulic pressure as a booster in the circuit. Field experiments were conducted at three working speeds (5, 6, and 7 km/h) and three grain tank load levels (60%, and 100% of capacity). The results showed that the average stopping time of the combine decreased from 2.28s in the fully hydraulic system to 1.75s in the air–oil system. Braking distance was also reduced from 18.05m to 10.2m, and the standard deviation of braking force decreased by approximately 27%. Statistical analysis confirmed a significant difference between the two systems at the probability level of p < 0.05. Numerical simulation also indicated a reduction in stress concentration in the disc and brake pad assembly. The findings of this study demonstrated that the simultaneous air–oil brake system provides superior and safer performance compared to the fully hydraulic system in straw-thresher combines and can serve as a reliable option for the design of future combines.

Keywords


Aby, G. R., & Issa, S. F. (2023). Safety of automated agricultural machineries: a systematic literature review. Safety, 9(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/safety9010013
Aykan, H., Çarman, K., Canlı, E., & Ekinci, Ş. (2023). Evaluation of tractor-trailer combination braking performance in different operating conditions. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 27(2), 219–225. https://doi.org/10.19113/sdufenbed.1191413
da Silva Bravo, R. R., de Cantuaria Gama, A. T., Oliveira, A. A. M., & De Negri, V. J. (2023). Component sizing and sensitivity analysis of design parameters of a hydraulic-pneumatic regenerative braking system for heavy duty vehicles. Energy, 264, 126021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.126021
Kamiński, Z., & Czaban, J. (2025). Stationary TypeApproval Test of the Tractor Pneumatic Braking System for Towed Vehicle Control. Machines, 13(3), 217. https://doi.org/10.3390/machines13030217
Radzajewski, P., & Guzek, M. (2023). Assessment of the impact of selected parameters of tractorsemitrailer set on the braking safety indicators. Applied Sciences, 13(9), 5336. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13095336
Shi, Z., Yan, Y., & Zhang, S. (2024). Variable boost characteristic control strategy of hydraulic systems for brake-by-wire based on driving style. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 29412. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-80788-2
Vakhidov, U. S., Kurkin, A. A., Levshunov, L. S., Molev, I. I., Proshin, D. N., & Sogin, A. V. (2020). Ensuring the stability of agricultural transport and technological machines equipped with ultra-low pressure tires during braking. Engineering technologies and systems, 30(4), 609– 623. https://doi.org/10.15507/2658- 4123.030.202004.609-623
Zagurskiy, A. (2024). Technical overview of the main types, designs, and materials of brake pads for mobile agricultural machinery. Scientific Reports of the National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, 4(20), 119– 130. https://doi.org/10.31548/dopovidi/3.2024.119
Zheng, L., Lu, Y., Wang, J., & Li, H. (2024). Braking failure anti-rollover control and hardwarein-the-loop verification of wire-controlled heavy vehicles. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 29802. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-80854-9