Econometric Analysis of Energy Consumption Pattern of Different Tillage Methods in Corn Cultivation

Document Type : Original Research

Authors

Department of Agricultural Machinery Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran.

Abstract

In this study, 5 different treatments of tillage and planting with 3 replications for corn crop were considered in cultivation and industry of Naz Sari plain. The investigated tillage treatments were conventional planting of corn instead of conventional wheat planting (CT-CT), no-tillage without residues instead of no-tillage without residues (NT-NT), No-tillage is a substitute for low-tillage and planting with combine tillers (MTCO-NTR), no-tillage replacing low-tillage with no-tillage (MTNT-NTR) and no-tillage replacing no-tillage (NTR-NTR). The results of this study showed that the highest amount of net energy was in the NTR-NTR system, while the CT-CT system had the lowest amount of net energy. In fodder corn cultivation, the highest production yield belonged to the NTR-NTR system with a value of 85,756 kg/ha; which has the highest energy output with 686.04 GJ/ha. The NTR-NTR system has the best performance in energy indicators, including energy ratio, net energy, energy productivity and energy specific, due to its higher performance in fodder production than other systems, with values of 26.20, 659.86 GJ/ha, 0.075 kg/MJ and 13.27 MJ/kg, respectively. The NTR-NTR system has performed the best in the indicators of energy ratio, productivity, net and energy special, and in the economic indicators of gross profit and non-special profit. On the other hand, the NT-NT system has surpassed other systems in the energy index of the systems and the economic indicators of P and BCR.

Keywords


Akdemir, S., Akcaoz, H., & Kizilay, H. (2012). An analysis of energy use and input costs for apple production in Turkey. Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment, 10(2), 473-479.
Calcante, A., & Oberti, R. (2019). A technical-economic comparison between conventional tillage and conservative techniques in paddy-rice production practice in northern Italy. Agronomy, 9(12), 886. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9120886
Emrani, A., & Berrada, A. (2024). A comprehensive review on techno-economic assessment of hybrid energy storage systems integrated with renewable energy. Journal of Energy Storage, 84, 111010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2024.111010
Ghaderpour, O., & Rafiee, S. (2017). Analysis and modeling of energy and production of dryland chickpea in the city of Bukan. Iranian Journal of Biosystems Engineering, 47(4), 720-711. https://doi.org/10.22059/ijbse.2017.60265
Gökdoğan, O., Erdoğan, O., Ertan, E., & Çobanoğlu, F. (2019). Evaluation of Energy and Economic Analysis of Chestnut (Castanea Sativa Mill.) Fruit Production in Turkey. Erwerbs-Obstbau, 61(3), 211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-019-00418-4
Gokdogan, O., Oguz, H., & Baran, M. (2017). Energy Input-Output Analysis in Organic Mulberry (Morus spp.) Production in Turkey: a Case Study Adiyaman-Tut Region. Erwerbs-Obstbau, 59(4), 325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-017-0333-y
Hatirli, S. A., Ozkan, B., & Fert, C. (2005). An econometric analysis of energy input–output in Turkish agriculture. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews9(6), 608-623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2004.07.001
Król-Badziak, A., Pishgar-Komleh, S. H., Rozakis, S., & Księżak, J. (2021). Environmental and socio-economic performance of different tillage systems in maize grain production: Application of Life Cycle Assessment and Multi-Criteria Decision Making. Journal of Cleaner Production, 278, 123792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123792
Lal, B., Rajput, D., Tamhankar, M., Agarwal, I., & Sharma, M. (2003). Energy use and output assessment of food‐forage production systems. Journal of agronomy and crop science, 189(2), 57-62. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-037X.2003.00004.x
Manafi Dastjerdi, M., & Lari, A. (2017). Evaluation and Comparison of Energy Indices in Wheat Farms in Townships of Alborz Province. Iranian Journal of Biosystems Engineering, 47(4), 771-779.
Martin-Gorriz, B., Maestre-Valero, J. F., Almagro, M., Boix-Fayos, C., & Martínez-Mena, M. (2020). Carbon emissions and economic assessment of farm operations under different tillage practices in organic rainfed almond orchards in semiarid Mediterranean conditions. Scientia Horticulturae, 261, 108978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2019.108978
Muangprathub, J., Boonnam, N., Kajornkasirat, S., Lekbangpong, N., Wanichsombat, A., & Nillaor, P. (2019). IoT and agriculture data analysis for smart farm. Computers and electronics in agriculture, 156, 467-474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2018.12.011
Naseri, H., Parashkoohi, M. G., Ranjbar, I., & Zamani, D. M. (2021). Energy-economic and life cycle assessment of sugarcane production in different tillage systems. Energy, 217, 119252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.119252
Rasul, G., & Sharma, B. (2016). The nexus approach to water–energy–food security: an option for adaptation to climate change. Climate policy, 16(6), 682-702. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2015.1029865
Skaf, L., Buonocore, E., Dumontet, S., Capone, R., & Franzese, P. P. (2019). Food security and sustainable agriculture in Lebanon: An environmental accounting framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 209, 1025-1032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.301
Unakitan, G., Hurma, H., & Yilmaz, F. (2010). An analysis of energy use efficiency of canola production in Turkey. Energy, 35(9), 3623-3627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.05.005
Uzunoz, M., Akcay, Y., & Esengun, K. (2008). Energy input-output analysis of sunflower seed (Helianthus annuus L.) oil in Turkey. Energy Sources, Part B, 3(3), 215-223. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567240701231834
Wani, N. R., Rather, R. A., Farooq, A., Padder, S. A., Baba, T. R., Sharma, S., . . . Ara, S. (2024). New insights in food security and environmental sustainability through waste food management. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 31(12), 17835-17857. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-26462-y